How To Clean Travel Trailer WILLFUL FILING OF COMPLAINT APPEAL TO PAY TWO MILLION SUNS

PRESS RELEASE NO JUSTICE ASSOCIATION WITH POWER CORRUPTION AND EDUCATION

SULLANA CMAC OF DIRECTOR OF THE ASSOCIATION OF LAW JUSTICIASINCORRUPCION BRING COMPLAINT AGAINST WILLFUL FILING OF THE COMPLAINT TO INVESTIGATE ILLEGAL PAYMENT OF TWO MILLION SUNS

executive director of the association justice without corruption has filed a complaint against the offending law Decision No. 005-2010 issued by the Deputy Prosecutor of the First Criminal Sullana Corporate Attorney, lawyer Franklin Gutiérrez Albornoz archiving available to the criminal complaint No. 2391 -09 filed against the managers of the CMAC Sullana and others on charges of improper use of fees charged abuse and other crimes

the detriment of the Caja Municipal de Ahorro y Credito de Sullana and the Peruvian State for the illegal payment over two million suns was a small group of officers and employees of that financial institution.

Law Complaint alleges that the Attorney Holder Holder Fiscal First Corporate Office, Uriarte Manuel Aguirre, who is initiating the preliminary investigation, after more than nine months after filed a complaint, just on September 7, 2010Is inhibited to know the complaint be referred to the brother of a Certified Public Accountant who works in the CMAC Sullana and explain the reason for the delay in investigating the complaint because such a tax must have been inhibited from beginning of the preliminary investigation to fall within the grounds for disqualification of hearing complaints that the law states that it issued several provisions under the anti-corruption association lawyers acted then all is null to have been affected due process and being also the law stating clearly what the functions of a deputy prosecutor and a prosecutor who is the holderresponsible for issuing the actual provisions of that class file and not a deputy prosecutor.

We stated in our complaint of law that the deputy prosecutor offending provision in the act falls contradiccióny is not according to law in its reasons for the eighth recital states that on May 27, 2010 has issued injunction SBS information, the National Public Budget Directorate and the Office of Legal Counsel MEF and clearly indicates that the date of the report of the Public Ministry has received no reply and then re-sen ; wing that on July 22, 2010 has requested the Ministry of Information andISCAL herein falls in flagrant contradiction to suppose that it had relied on false facts to cast the offending file layout creating controversy by indicating at the same time IF response has been received and has not received a response from the public authorities to where he has directed the Office requested information in the complaint. In any case, the Deputy Prosecutor was obliged to mention what are the trades that have sent the aforementioned government agencies, and that is what is indicated as logical so you have your choice of archiving.

For all this is being requested to the Deputy Public Prosecutor that all proceedings be lifted to his superior who with best approachand clarify the news:

http://correoperu.pe/correo/nota.php?txtEdi_id=7&txtSecci_parent=0&txtSecci_id=69&txtNota_id=446639 as the director of the association justice without corruption if his complaint was ratified in spite of the intimidation that was seized by one of the reported nerve was present in declaracióny which even threatened the deputy public prosecutor to complain if you have not filed the complaint, On the other hand in this partnership against corruption, we believe that if there the evidence sufficient to declare our rights complaint was founded.